Bringing Safety Culture to Life
Safety culture often remains abstract – distant from the reality of project work.
For us, safety culture is more than a principle – it’s the foundation of how we work.
It means complete honesty with our clients, a deep sense of responsibility in every project phase, and the constant drive to develop the most effective and reliable solutions for trustworthy systems.
Building Trusted Partnerships
Entrusting someone with a task critical to your product development is a big decision – and an even bigger one if your product is safety-critical.
Our team has already contributed to a wide range of safety-critical development projects – always with a focus on quality and what is actually relevant.
For us, safety follows intrinsically from quality – through thoughtful application of standards, not blind compliance. When development is based on solid architectures, clean code, and well-suited processes applied by skilled people, achieving functional safety is only a small step away.
After all, the goal is to create a safe, reliable product – not an extremely well-documented unsafe one.
You’re very welcome to talk to us about previous projects, customer satisfaction, and successful assessments – or about your next development task.
Building Trusted Systems
A reliable system is not the result of process documentation alone, nor of a safe hardware platform, nor of correct software code. It’s the result of aligning all three – from concept to integration, with a focus on actual product safety.
That’s why, at safecubed, we don’t just follow the V-model. We think about safety in three complimentary dimensions: process, system, and software.
Process
Who needs a highway for a horse carriage?
A complex process for a simple task is like building a highway for a horse carriage.
That might sound surprising coming from ASPICE assessors – but we’ve seen too many projects lose direction by focusing on process instead of product. Processes are important – as tools to support capable teams, not as substitutes for engineering judgment.
Wherever we are involved, we establish processes that truly support product safety – not ones that drain resources best used elsewhere.
What sets us apart is this: we focus on fulfilling the intent behind development standards. That’s why we care about outcomes, and not about worst-case interpretations.
System
Would you ban paper because it might cause a cut?
The system level is where real safety happens as even the best hardware design is useless without proper software. System-level thinking is crucial to not end up with expensive solutions that may even by unreliable or un-safe.
When designing safety concepts, our architects choose the proper technologies for the most efficient hardware-software integration – from the beginning.
We also assist you in defining which risks are actually present and which mechanisms therefore are actually necessary.
As safety means absence of unreasonable risk and not of any risk, we can together build what's needed - and not an ASIL-D Swiss army knife.
Software
Without code, your ECU is a paperweight
A safe design is only valuable if it can be implemented in software.
With years of experience in OS configuration, AUTOSAR, model-based design, code generation and embedded development, we select technologies that suit your application – and your safety requirements.
Our software is efficient, robust, and assessable. We avoid self-serving documentation only used for compliance without purpose and instead put the effort in cleaner, clearer and safer code. Still, we meet every relevant norm requirement for code, design, and test - proven in many assessments.
Because real safety is in the execution, not in the paperwork.
Process
Who needs a highway for a horse carriage?
A complex process for a simple task is like building a highway for a horse carriage.
That might sound surprising coming from ASPICE assessors – but we’ve seen too many projects lose direction by focusing on process instead of product. Processes are important – as tools to support capable teams, not as substitutes for engineering judgment.
Wherever we are involved, we establish processes that truly support product safety – not ones that drain resources best used elsewhere.
What sets us apart is this: we focus on fulfilling the intent behind development standards. That’s why we care about outcomes, and not about worst-case interpretations.
System
Would you ban paper because it might cause a cut?
The system level is where real safety happens as even the best hardware design is useless without proper software. System-level thinking is crucial to not end up with expensive solutions that may even by unreliable or un-safe. When designing safety concepts, our architects choose the proper technologies for the most efficient hardware-software integration – from the beginning. We also assist you in defining which risks are actually present and which mechanisms therefore are actually necessary. As safety means absence of unreasonable risk and not of any risk, we can together build what's needed - and not an ASIL-D Swiss army knife.
Software
Without code, your ECU is a paperweight
A safe design is only valuable if it can be implemented in software. With years of experience in OS configuration, AUTOSAR, model-based design, code generation and embedded development, we select technologies that suit your application – and your safety requirements. Our software is efficient, robust, and assessable. We avoid self-serving documentation only used for compliance without purpose and instead put the effort in cleaner, clearer and safer code. Still, we meet every relevant norm requirement for code, design, and test - proven in many assessments. Because real safety is in the execution, not in the paperwork.